In this construction claim, the Defendant attempted to set aside a garnishee order made against its bank. We successfully resisted the attempt; the Court found that the Defendant’s purpose was “self-serving” and “desperate”, ultimately deciding that its application was “a frivolous one for which no litigant should have a licence to pursue”.

We acted against a defendant who had failed to pay for goods sold and delivered. Although the defendant claimed that the wrong goods were delivered, we successfully obtained judgement for the claimant for a sum of around $100,000.00.

In this divorce matter, we acted for the Husband: a businessman and a director/shareholder of various companies. The Husband obtained a 58.5% share of the matrimonial assets (about $2.5 million) and was not required to transfer any part of his companies to the Wife.

In an unusual case, the wife sought to divorce the husband on the basis of his unreasonable behaviour. We acted for the husband and successfully had her divorce action dismissed: https://sg.news.yahoo.com/remisier-wife-fails-divorce-taxi-driver-husband-grounds-unreasonable-behaviour-132050362.html

In this divorce matter before the Court of Appeal, we acted for the wife in obtaining a 33.6% share of the matrimonial assets, amounting to almost $11 million.

In this construction claim under the Security of Payment Adjudication Act, we obtained a determination for more than $6 million. The Respondent was represented by WongPartnership LLP.